Blog

Passerbyers or Passersby or Passerby? Which Is Correct?

Emma Brooke

No Comments

You’ve probably heard someone use the word “passerby” and wondered: “Is that even right? Shouldn’t it be passerbyers or something like that?” Well, you’re not alone! English has a way of messing with our minds, especially when it comes to those odd plural forms.

This seemingly small question—”Passerbyers or Passersby or Passerby?”—pops up more often than you might think. And trust me, you’re not the only one getting confused! But don’t worry, we’re going to break it all down and figure out exactly which term is correct. Spoiler alert: It’s “passersby”, but there’s a lot more to it than just that.

In this article, we’ll take a fun, detailed journey through why “passerbyers” is a no-go, how “passersby” came to be, and why it works. We’ll also explore some fascinating language quirks that make this question even more interesting. Ready? Let’s dive in!

The Mystery of ‘Passerby’

Let’s start by understanding what a “passerby” actually means. Picture this: you’re walking down the street and someone passes by you. They’re not stopping, just casually going about their business. That person is a passerby. Pretty simple, right?

But here’s where it gets a little tricky. “Passerby” is a compound noun, which means it’s made up of two words—passer (someone who passes by) and by (indicating the action). Now, English being the tricky language it is, when we want to make a plural of a compound noun, it doesn’t always follow the typical rules.

So, if you’ve ever wondered why “passersby” doesn’t follow the usual “add an -s” rule for plurals, you’re about to find out why.

See also  Team Which or Team Who or Team That? Understanding the Correct Usage

Why ‘Passerbyers’ Is Wrong

Now, you might be thinking, “Okay, if ‘passerby’ is one person, then ‘passerbyers’ must be the plural form, right?” Well, no, not exactly.

Here’s the deal: “Passerbyers” is not a real word. It might sound logical, but English doesn’t work like that all the time. You wouldn’t say “runnerers” or “swimmerers”, would you? That’s because when compound nouns are involved, we often make the plural only to the first word of the compound. This means that “passersby” is the correct plural, and “passerbyers” is a complete no-go.

Let’s break it down with another example: “attorneys general.” While the singular form is “attorney general,” when we talk about more than one, it becomes “attorneys general”—we make the plural on attorneys, not “general.”

The same rule applies to “passersby.” You pluralize “passers” and leave “by” alone. It’s a weird but consistent pattern in English grammar!

Why ‘Passersby’ Is Correct

Alright, so now we know “passerbyers” is off the table. But what’s the deal with “passersby”? Why does it work, and why is it the correct plural form?

Here’s where things get even more interesting: The term “passersby” follows a special rule in English, and it’s not just an oddball situation. Compound nouns like “passersby” follow an irregular pluralization pattern. When we form the plural, the change happens only to the first part of the compound (in this case, passer becomes passers), and the second part (the word by) stays the same.

This might sound confusing, but it’s actually not that rare in English. Consider “mothers-in-law” and “brothers-in-law”. The plural form only changes for the first word. So “passersby” is following a time-honored pattern, even if it seems a little odd.

Real-World Example:

  • “I saw a group of passersby during my lunch break today.”
  • “The park was filled with passersby, all going their separate ways.”

It’s natural, it’s correct, and it fits perfectly in everyday conversation. See? Not so bad after all!

The Evolution of ‘Passerby’

Okay, let’s take a quick trip down memory lane. The word “passerby” has been around for a long time, and like many English words, it’s undergone a little bit of evolution. Back in the day, passerby wasn’t always a compound noun. It used to be just a descriptive phrase, but over time, people started using it as a single word, and the compound noun form stuck.

See also  150+ Commonly Used Verbs That Start With B

Interestingly, English has a history of taking phrases and smooshing them together into single words. For example, “everyone” used to be “every one,” but English got tired of saying two words and squished them together.

The same thing happened with “passerby,” and now it’s solidified as a single word with a unique plural form.

How ‘Passersby’ Fits into English Grammar

So, you might still be wondering: Why doesn’t English just follow the rules like every other language? Well, English is full of quirks and exceptions. And when it comes to compound nouns, English doesn’t follow the predictable, straightforward rules you might expect.

Take the word “pickpocket”. If you’re talking about more than one pickpocket, you don’t say “pickpocketses.” Nope, you just add an -s to the end, and pickpockets is born.

The same goes for “passersby.” The plural doesn’t follow the usual pluralization rules. Instead of tacking an -s onto the end of “passerby”, you make the plural of passer and leave by as it is.

It’s one of those quirky things that makes English… well, interesting.

Passersby in Literature and Pop Culture

You’ve probably encountered “passersby” in various books, movies, and even in everyday conversation. Let’s face it, the term sounds fancy and adds a bit of depth to any sentence. Take a look at this example:

  • “The passersby stopped to stare at the commotion, but quickly continued on their way.”

In literature, passersby often serve as a symbol of fleeting moments or brief encounters. Think of a busy city street where people are just rushing by—each one a story, yet none of them stopping. Authors use “passersby” to create that sense of movement, change, and impermanence.

And in pop culture? From movies about big cities to everyday social media posts, passersby shows up all over the place, usually to convey a feeling of transience or observation.

See also  "As Evidenced By" vs. "As Evident By": Which One is Correct and Why It Matters

Common Mistakes Similar to ‘Passersby’

Alright, let’s get real for a minute. English is tricky—especially when it comes to pluralizing words. People often make mistakes with other words that follow a similar pattern to “passersby.” For example, consider the following:

  • “Brothers-in-law” vs. “brothers in laws”
  • “Mothers-in-law” vs. “mothers in law”

Both of these are compound nouns where the plural only applies to the first part of the phrase. It’s easy to get confused, but once you understand the pattern, it becomes second nature.

Final Verdict: What Should You Say?

So, let’s wrap this up. You now know that the correct plural form of “passerby” is “passersby.” It’s a quirky compound noun, and its pluralization follows a cool (but sometimes confusing) English rule. The term “passerbyers”? Just forget about it—it’s not a thing.

Here’s the simple takeaway: Use “passersby” when you want to refer to more than one person passing by. It’s grammatically correct, sounds good, and will keep you looking sharp in all your writing and speaking.

FAQs: Passerbyers, Passersby, or Passerby?

1. What is the correct plural of “passerby”?

The correct plural form is “passersby.” The word “passerbyers” is incorrect and not used in standard English.

2. Why isn’t “passerbyers” a real word?

English doesn’t add “-ers” to create plurals for compound nouns. Instead, the plural is applied to the first word. This is why we say “passersby” and not “passerbyers.”

3. Are there other words like “passersby” that follow this pattern?

Yes! Some similar examples include:

  • “Attorneys general” (not “attorney generals”)
  • “Mothers-in-law” (not “mother-in-laws”)
  • “Brothers-in-law” (not “brother-in-laws”)

4. Can “passersby” be used in everyday speech and writing?

Absolutely! It’s a perfectly normal word to use when referring to multiple people passing by. For example:

  • “The passersby stopped to watch the street performer.”

5. How can I remember the correct plural form?

A simple trick:

  • Think of “passersby” like “mothers-in-law.”
  • The first word (passer) is what changes, while the second word (by) stays the same.

Conclusion

So, next time you’re writing or chatting with friends about the people who walk past you, you can proudly say passersby.” Just remember, English is full of quirks, and this one is a prime example of how grammar doesn’t always follow the rules we expect. Stay curious, stay sharp, and keep enjoying the beautiful mess that is the English language!

Leave a Comment