When it comes to the phrase “first priority,” there’s a lot of debate among language enthusiasts, grammar experts, and everyday speakers. While it might sound like a simple expression, it raises important questions about redundancy, linguistic evolution, and clarity in communication. In this article, we’ll explore whether saying “first priority” is grammatically correct or a misuse of the English language. By the end, you’ll have a solid understanding of the issue, backed by facts, expert opinions, and real-world examples.
Understanding the Meaning of ‘Priority’
To fully grasp the discussion around “first priority,” it’s crucial to understand what priority means in the first place.
Priority originates from the Latin word prioritas, which means “the fact of being earlier or more important.” It refers to something that holds more importance or urgency over other things. Essentially, it’s a term used to denote what should be dealt with first or given more attention.
In its traditional use, priority referred to something singular, indicating the most important or urgent matter. So, when we say something is a “priority,” we’re indicating that it’s at the top of the list, above all other concerns.
But then comes the issue—can something have more than one priority? The use of “first priority” suggests a ranking system, as if there are multiple levels of priority. The key question is: Is that the intended use of the word, or is it redundant?
The Argument Against ‘First Priority’
Redundancy Issue: Can a Priority Have Degrees?
The central argument against “first priority” is that it’s redundant. If something is a priority, it’s already at the top of the list. In other words, using the term “first priority” suggests that priority can have degrees, which is somewhat contradictory to its original meaning.
Think about it. If you’re trying to communicate that something is the most urgent or important, doesn’t saying “priority” already imply that it’s first on the list? Adding the word “first” doesn’t make much sense from a logical perspective.
Logical Breakdown: Does ‘First’ Add Any Meaning?
To illustrate this further, let’s take an example:
- “Our first priority is to fix the technical issue.”
If priority already means the most important task, then why do we need to say “first”? It almost seems like we’re using extra words that don’t serve a purpose. Some argue that first priority is like saying “top most important task.” Isn’t it redundant?
Grammar and Linguistic Analysis: What Experts Say
Leading grammarians and linguists also weigh in on this redundancy. Many argue that “first priority” is a misnomer. They point to how priority is already a superlative, meaning there’s no need to specify “first” because it implies importance or urgency.
For example, according to Merriam-Webster, priority means “the quality or state of being earlier or more important.” Adding “first” becomes unnecessary and, in some cases, grammatically incorrect.
The Case for Using ‘First Priority’
Despite the arguments against it, many people still use “first priority” regularly in business, media, and even casual conversations. So, what’s driving this? Is it simply a matter of convenience or evolution in the language?
Modern Linguistic Shifts
Over time, language evolves based on how people use it. In modern English, particularly in professional and corporate settings, the phrase “first priority” has become commonplace.
This shift is part of a broader trend in English where people modify existing words or phrases to fit their communication needs. While grammarians may argue that “first priority” is redundant, it’s important to recognize that language adapts based on how it’s used by the majority.
Corporate and Practical Communication
In business communication, especially in leadership or project management contexts, phrases like “first priority” often serve a practical purpose. They help emphasize the most important task in a clear and simple manner.
For example:
- “Safety is our first priority.”
This phrase might be used to underline that, in a given situation, safety is the topmost concern.
Here, “first priority” isn’t intended to indicate a ranking system but to give a clear, emphatic statement of importance.
Emphasis vs. Redundancy
Sometimes, people use “first priority” not because it’s technically correct but because it adds emphasis. In certain contexts, especially when a strong message needs to be communicated, “first priority” can enhance the urgency.
For instance:
- “The well-being of our employees is our first priority.”
By emphasizing first priority, the speaker conveys a sense of urgency and commitment, which could resonate more than just saying, “Well-being is a priority.”
Expert Opinions & Dictionary References
While it’s useful to explore the debate, let’s take a closer look at what authoritative sources have to say about “first priority.”
What Major Dictionaries Say
Leading dictionaries like Merriam-Webster and Oxford English Dictionary do not explicitly endorse “first priority” as incorrect. They define priority as something that is more important or urgent, without offering any reference to first priority being a flawed phrase.
Here’s what Merriam-Webster says about priority:
- Priority: “the quality or state of being earlier or more important.”
However, none of these sources directly accept first priority as grammatically ideal. Most experts would argue that, while it may be widely accepted in casual or business contexts, it doesn’t strictly adhere to grammatical precision.
Insights from Linguists
Linguists often emphasize the fluid nature of language. Professor Steven Pinker, a renowned linguist, has discussed how languages evolve based on cultural trends rather than strict adherence to “rules.” This supports the idea that “first priority” might be grammatically frowned upon but still widely used.
Real-World Usage & Acceptability
To understand how “first priority” is used in the real world, let’s examine how native speakers and professionals incorporate it into their communication.
How Native Speakers Actually Use ‘First Priority’
Native speakers, especially in everyday conversation, might not think twice about using first priority. It rolls off the tongue more easily than priority alone.
Examples in everyday contexts:
- “Our first priority is getting the project completed on time.”
- “My first priority is to get to the airport.”
Here, “first priority” seems like a natural way to convey urgency.
Common Professional, Media, and Academic Instances
In professional settings, especially in leadership and communication, first priority is frequently used to highlight key objectives.
Examples in media:
- “Public safety should always be the first priority in crisis situations.”
Academic settings:
- “The first priority of this study is to investigate the health impacts of air pollution.”
These instances reflect that, although grammatically debatable, first priority is an acceptable and practical phrase in many contexts.
Similar Redundant Phrases in English
English is full of redundant phrases—expressions that repeat information unnecessarily but remain widely accepted due to their ease of use and commonality.
Examples:
- “Final conclusion”: A conclusion is already final, so adding “final” is redundant.
- “Past history”: History, by definition, refers to the past.
- “Close proximity”: Proximity already suggests closeness.
Despite the redundancy, these phrases are ingrained in everyday speech.
When You Should and Shouldn’t Use ‘First Priority’
Acceptable Contexts
- Business Communication: When emphasizing key tasks or initiatives.
- Leadership: To underline the top concern in decision-making.
- Marketing: For bold, attention-grabbing statements about what’s most important.
When to Avoid
- Academic Writing: Clarity and precision are paramount in research and formal writing. Instead of saying “first priority,” use terms like “top priority” or “primary concern.”
- Legal Documents: Accuracy and conciseness are essential. Avoid redundancy by simply stating “priority.”
Alternatives to ‘First Priority’
- Top priority
- Highest priority
- Main focus
- Primary objective
What This Debate Teaches Us About Language Evolution
The debate around “first priority” highlights how language evolves based on usage, not just grammatical rules. In fact, many language norms have been shaped over time by how people speak and write.
What we see today with first priority is a linguistic shift that mirrors how language adapts to cultural and social needs. Many phrases once considered improper have become accepted, illustrating that language is dynamic.
Conclusion: Should You Use ‘First Priority’ or Not?
So, is it correct to say “first priority”? The answer isn’t black and white. While grammatically redundant, first priority is widely used and accepted in various contexts, especially in business and casual communication.
Here’s the takeaway:
- If you want clarity and precision in formal or academic writing, avoid first priority and stick with priority or other alternatives.
- In casual speech or business contexts, it’s acceptable to use first priority, especially if you want to emphasize the urgency or importance of a task.
FAQs: Is It Correct to Say “First Priority”?
Is “first priority” grammatically incorrect?
Technically, yes. Since priority already means the most important or urgent thing, adding “first” can be considered redundant. However, it is widely used in business, media, and casual speech for emphasis.
Why do people use “first priority” if it’s redundant?
Many people use it for clarity and emphasis, especially in corporate settings. Saying “first priority” reinforces that something is the topmost concern.
What are some alternatives to “first priority”?
If you want to avoid redundancy, try using:
- Top priority
- Primary concern
- Highest priority
- Main focus
- Chief objective
Do dictionaries accept “first priority”?
Major dictionaries like Merriam-Webster and Oxford English Dictionary define priority as something that comes first in importance. While they don’t explicitly state that “first priority” is incorrect, they also don’t officially endorse it.
Is “first priority” used in professional communication?
Yes. Many companies, executives, and organizations use “first priority” in official statements, marketing, and internal communication to highlight key concerns.
Is “first priority” acceptable in academic or legal writing?
No. Academic and legal writing prioritize clarity and precision, so it’s best to use “priority” without “first” or choose an alternative like “top priority” or “primary concern.”
What are other redundant phrases similar to “first priority”?
English has many common redundancies, such as:
- Final conclusion (a conclusion is already final)
- Past history (history always refers to the past)
- Close proximity (proximity already implies closeness)
- End result (a result is inherently an end)
Does “first priority” sound unnatural?
Not at all. Even though it’s redundant, it sounds natural and widely accepted in everyday speech. Many native speakers use it without realizing the redundancy.
Should I avoid “first priority” in my writing?
It depends on the context. If you’re writing formally, avoid it. If you’re speaking or writing in a casual or business setting, it’s fine to use.
What’s the final verdict? Can I use “first priority”?
Yes, but use it wisely. If you’re speaking or writing in an informal or business setting, it’s generally accepted. But for formal, academic, or legal writing, it’s best to use “priority” without “first” to maintain grammatical precision.
As the visionary founder and CEO of Globals English, Emma Brooke is dedicated to transforming the way individuals learn and master the English language.